Monday, July 16, 2012
Seeds of Brave New World?
In Alix Spiegel's July 16, 2012 NPR article "Can Science Plant Brain Seeds That Make You Vote?" we have a hint at the psychological conditioning that Huxley foresees as one of several methods of control used by the World Controllers in his novel Brave New World. Ironically however, active participation in the democratic process is precisely the kind of behavior that can help prevent the kind of subtle technologized control that makes the Brave New World possible - unless, of course, those 'seeds' also guide or override our natural choice of candidate.
In the novel it is the ever-present hypnopedia that continually plants slogan seeds that help keep the populace docile and obedient, and even those who know about the conditioning and/or have helped design the hypnopedic seeds are subject to their influence. As Bernard Marx reflects in chapter 3: "Sixty-two thousand four hundred repetitions make one truth" a fact that Joesph Goebbels recognized which is in full operation today - especially in politics.
But, as Spiegel notes, the successful sprouting of the brain seed is at least partly due to the visualization of a future action or response. This seems to be part of the World State's program for de-sensitizing children to death in chapter 11. While voting is a desirable and necessary part of a healthy democracy, we might wonder about the "brain seeds" planted in us by corporate propagandists as suggested by MIT Cognitive Scientist & Linguistics Professor Noam Chomsky in his 1998 recording Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind.
So, we have to wonder, has hypnopedia been here all along? The kind of critical thinking that Huxley indirectly encourages in Brave New World should move us all to ask: what ideas or attitudes are sprouting in my brain and who planted the seeds?
Sunday, February 6, 2011
Daphnia, Genetics & Adaptation

progress is lovely, isn't it?" To which
Bernard glumly responds by muttering the hypnopedic formula that imprinted her brain with the phrase."Liquid air, television, vibro-vacuum massage, radio, boiling caffeine solution, hot contraceptives, and eight different kinds of scent were laid on in every bedroom. The synthetic music plant was working as they entered the hall and left nothing to be desired. A notice in the lift announced that there were sixty Escalator-Squash-Racket Courts in the hotel, and that Obstacle and Electro-magnetic Golf could both be played in the park."
"But it sounds simply too lovely," cried Lenina. "I almost wish we could stay here. Sixty Escalator-Squash Courts . . ."
"There won't be any in the Reservation," Bernard warned her. "And no scent, no television, no hot water even. If you feel you can't stand it, stay here till I come back."
Lenina was quite offended. "Of course I can stand it. I only said it was lovely here because . . . well, because progress is lovely, isn't it?"
"Five hundred repetitions once a week from thirteen to seventeen," said Bernard wearily, as though to himself."
Unlike the Daphnia, contemporary human "adaptations" are the excretions and extrusions of technology, not our own biology. While our technologies do help us to encounter various environments successfully, most often they keep us from having to adapt and since they are not a part of our bodies they can be lost or taken away. If we genetically generated our own tools from our own bodies or if we could re-grow an organ or a limb, we might be closer to a durable adaptation, but what genetic engineering would it take to get us there?
Friday, January 7, 2011
upcoming adaptation?

It would make an interesting exercise to read the novel, listen to part 1 and part 2 of the 1956 CBS radio broadcast (Huxley narrates!) and watch the two TV versions above followed by a discussion of the various choices made in each adaptation and how they affect our understanding of the narrative.
Tuesday, August 10, 2010
Just because we can?
"Two thousand pharmacologists and bio-chemists were subsidized in A.F. 178.
"Six years later it was being produced commercially.
"Let's bait him."
"Euphoric, narcotic, pleasantly hallucinant."
"Glum, Marx, glum."
The clap on the shoulder made him start, look up. It was that brute Henry Foster.
In a recent NPR story Is Emotional Pain Necessary?" Alix Spiegel explores our ability to chemically avoid difficult and unpleasant experiences like grief. Huxley's fictional soma is not mentioned but our growing pharmacopeia is increasingly blooming with mood altering drugs and Big Pharma is a multi-billion dollar industry.
Clearly, some of these pharmaceuticals are helpful and bring much needed relief to many people, but it may be time to reconsider whether some of the emotions or experiences we try to avoid might actually be important, if painful, to encounter directly.
For example, no matter who you are it is certain that you will experience grief at some point in your life - unless you're a sociopath.
Spiegel's story reveals that in the most recent draft of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM), the book used by psychiatrists to diagnose mental illness, a debate is roiling about whether grief should be considered a treatable mental illness if it lasts longer than two weeks.
The natural grief we experience at the death of a loved one includes loss of appetite, loss of sleep, lack of concentration but "in the new manual, if symptoms like these persist for more than two weeks, the bereaved person will be considered to have a mental disorder: major depression. And treatment, either therapy or medication, is recommended."
So that's it: you get a 2-week limit for grief and then it's back to work. Longer than that and you're considered sick and in need of treatment.
This is one of the reasons that soma is so useful in Huxley's fictional World State - it keeps the wheels of production spinning. No pesky human emotions to slow things down or cause disturbance.
In the last three chapters of Brave New World, John Savage challenges Mustapha Mond to justify the ways of the World State. In the process of their conversation, John argues for facing rather than avoiding difficulties, challenges and pain. These unpleasant experiences strengthen our will, make us more self-aware, and remind us of our ability to survive.
"The Savage nodded, frowning. "You got rid of them. Yes, that's just like you. Getting rid of everything unpleasant instead of learning to put up with it. Whether 'tis better in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, or to take arms against a sea of troubles and by opposing end them . . . But you don't do either. Neither suffer nor oppose. You just abolish the slings and arrows. "It's too easy.""
It was the easy life of the Eloi in H. G. Wells' The Time Machine that left them physically and intellectually weak:
"What, unless biological science is a mass of errors, is the cause of human intelligence and vigour? Hardship and freedom: conditions under which the active, strong, and subtle survive and the weaker go to the wall; conditions that put a premium upon the loyal alliance of capable men, upon self-restraint, patience, and decision."
Tuesday, June 8, 2010
Not Bokanovsky's Process, but....
Recently NPR News featured a story that demonstrates the continuing relevance of Huxley's insights in his novel Brave New World: "Scientists Reach Milestone On Way To Artificial Life". When Craig Venter says that "we could create new species to do what we want them to do, not what they evolved to do" his hybrid entity of synthesized DNA and biological cell suggests a step towards Huxley's fictional world of manufactured commoditized human beings:"...a bokanovskified egg will bud, will proliferate, will divide. From eight to ninety-six buds, and every bud will grow into a perfectly formed embryo, and every embryo into a full-sized adult. Making ninety-six human beings grow where only one grew before. Progress."
MORE FASTER EASIER MORE FASTER EASIER MORE FASTER
And perhaps Venter's invention will prove to be progress, to move us forward in solving some of the grave threats to our species, but creating a corporation to manufacture artificial servants for-profit may not be the most promising first step.
Monday, April 12, 2010
Designing Miranda
In addition to the color scheme, we chose two separate fonts to use on the site, one serif, and one sans-serif. Since studies have shown that sans-serif fonts are far easier to read on a screen, we chose that for the text of the novel to assist readers. However, the particular font we chose is Helvetica, as it is one of the most widely used fonts in the world, enhancing the sense of a unified world envisioned in Brave New World. The serif font we chose for the menu and banner is Courier New, designed to resemble the output of a typewriter. As such, it also encourages a sense of uniformity, as well as ideas of mechanical control.
What do you think of the design?



